Archives

Update on: Interesting tid-bit about Writers Digest Self-Published Contest

Bob enlightened some of us on Linkedin about the scam Writers Digest is pulling off with their indie book contest.
It’s also enlightening that you don’ t find out about this until after you’ve filled out all the “paperwork” and are about the send in your money. How sneaky is that. Shame on you Writers Digest.

http://lnkd.in/SsJi69

Indie authors, save your $100 for publishing your book.

Thanks Bob for letting us in on this!

_____________________________________________

Update:

Apparently WD heard all the complaining about this issue and has backtracked on their contest fine print clause. Below is a letter a writer received recently from WD, someone who withdrew her book from the indie publishing contest after learning about this issue. I’m not sure I believe the WD person when he/she says they have never heard of this issue before, but they did remove it.

See – the writing community does have a bit of power!

= = = = = = = = = = = = =
“I’ve been in the WD publisher role for about three years now and to be honest the fine print noted below is actually not something I’d seen before. Too many moving parts, too few people I’m afraid.

“The clause for nonexclusive one-time rights is actually meant for our Annual Competition, which is made up entirely of short stories. At the end of the competition, we take the winning stories (grand prize winners and runners up) and turn them into a short book. The book stays in print until the next year’s Annual Competition. The request for rights in this case is pretty standard and the winners are generally quite pleased about having their work published, even if the lifespan of the work is of a relatively short duration. It’s also a one time, non-exclusive right, so it’s not meant to take publication rights away from the authors. They can publish their work elsewhere at any time.

“For years, I think the competition division has applied the clause below to every competition’s fine print simply as a matter of convenience, even though it only applies to the Annual Competition. Unfortunately I didn’t realize that. We actually don’t do anything with the winning entries of the self publishing competition, so the paragraph below doesn’t even apply. We just award the prizes and that’s it.

“I’m grateful you called this to our attention, as I might never have realized otherwise. I’ve asked the competition division to have the clause struck from the fine print of the self publishing competition wherever it appears online and in any future print promotional materials (though we don’t do much of that anymore). So if you’re still interested in participating in the self pub competition, wait a few days and the offending clause should have been eliminated.”

Some good information when you writers out there want to start publishing that pile of stories you been accumulating.

pgaccount's avatarPublishers' Graphics Blog

IMG_7It’s a common question: does it make sense to print your books offset or use print on demand (POD)? Both printing processes offer unique advantages that can make the decision difficult. Let’s take a look some of the factors to consider:

Print Quantity:

Size of the print run is the probably your most important consideration. Conventional offset printing is best suited for producing large print runs of 500 books or more. With relatively long lead-times and high press set up and make-ready costs, larger press runs are generally needed to make conventional offset printing cost-effective.

Smaller press runs of 100 or less are becoming increasingly common as a way to eliminate unused inventory and costly storage. If your quantity ranges between 300-500 books, your best bet is to quote both ways: offset and digital.

Short press runs do have advantages when it comes to testing the waters. Printing one or two…

View original post 480 more words

The Art of Editing: Why Every Good Author Needs a Great Editor | Where Writers Win

I wanted to share this nice piece about editing by Sarah Hackley.

The Art of Editing: Why Every Good Author Needs a Great Editor | Where Writers Win.

Article about Book Design

Nice article by Joel Friedlander for Createspace on Book Design for Indie authors: https://www.createspace.com/en/community/docs/DOC-1651

The Year of the Author?

…Now more than ever authors are in the driver’s seat. Not all of them, not all the time but more than a decade ago, certainly.

In the case of Random House, authors associations pressured it into playing nicer with authors. In the case of Day, when an author does want to play with a publisher, it’s generally on the author’s terms. And in the case of a self-published author topping the best-seller list, when authors play the game without the help of a publisher, sometimes they win.

Read more…

The Year of the Author?.

Vanity Press Naughty list

More wise words for those looking to self-publish. Buyer beware!

Words about Word

Rich Adin's avatarAn American Editor

There is at least one area of the manuscript process in which authors and editors equally fail: Their lack of mastery of the tools of their trade, especially Microsoft Word.

What brings this to mind are recent queries on several fora by editors and authors asking how to accomplish what I view as basic procedures in Word, as well as queries asking how to do something in Word for which they already own an add-in to Word, such as EditTools or Editor’s ToolKit Plus, that easily accomplishes the task. I would probably have ignored those fora queries were it not for a manuscript I was asked to look at which was a nightmare of formatting.

What is it about text boxes that attracts authors? What is that compels authors and editors to create yet another new style in a futile attempt to make the manuscript look visually like what they think it…

View original post 1,218 more words